GM Price Talk -- Confusion Takes Hold

If the government plans on getting its $50 billion back from GM, the company's stock has to sell for at least $134 a share. But the chairman has said he expects to see the IPO shares priced between $20 and $25. Thus, he must have plans for a split before the stock hits the market.

The bigger question is how many shares can the company sell? And, of course, the valuation. It's already been announced that GM hopes its employees will buy shares too, which means they'll become stock touts hoping to get more people into the same hot water in which they're about to immerse themselves.

What are GM shares worth? Ford trades for about 8 times 2011 earnings. Does GM deserve a similar multiple? What will GM earn in 2011?

GM chairman predicts $20 to $25 share price in IPO

GM Chairman Whitacre predicts share price of $20 to $25 in initial public stock offering

Wednesday October 13, 2010

DETROIT (AP) -- When General Motors Co. sells stock to the public, it will be priced from $20 to $25 per share, Chairman Ed Whitacre predicted Wednesday.

Whitacre told reporters at an event in San Antonio, Texas, that the automaker's initial public offering would take place sometime in November.

"It's going to be somewhere in the $20 range, $20, $25, something like that," Whitacre said, according to WOAI-TV and the San Antonio Express-News.

GM had not previously announced a date or price for the IPO, although it had been tentatively set for next month. The automaker is waiting for U.S. regulators to sign off on its proposed plan to sell shares.

Whitacre, who stepped down as GM's CEO Sept. 1 but remains chairman, said it was too early to give an exact price for the stock's debut. He said that the IPO would be successful because GM is making a profit and has great cars and trucks.

GM became a private company last year after filing for bankruptcy protection. The U.S. government became the largest shareholder when it gave the company $50 billion to help it survive. The government hopes to recoup that investment by selling its 61 percent stake over time. That stake amounts to just over 300 million shares of GM stock.

It's unclear just how many of those shares the government will offer in the initial stock sale. Whitacre's replacement as CEO, Dan Akerson, has said it will take many sales over a couple of years for the government to fully unload its stake.

The government hopes to sell a small number of shares at first, then more in follow-up sales. The success of those sales depends on whether GM's financial situation keeps improving and its stock price rises.

GM's other shareholders, the Canadian and Ontario governments, a union health care trust fund and former GM bondholders, also are expected to sell some of their stakes.

Many investors had been waiting for GM to announce the share price, which traditionally is done in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. GM had previously refused comment on the IPO price, saying that it was in a legal "quiet period" before the sale.

Neither the SEC nor GM would comment on Whitacre's statements, which one IPO analyst called a trial balloon to see how investors would react to the price.

GM has an estimated 550 million shares outstanding, and they have been valued by a government bailout watchdog at around $133.78 per share. The company would have to issue more shares before the IPO to bring the price down to the $20 to $25 range. The move, called a split, would give shareholders around five to seven new shares for every share they now own.

SEC rules do not stop executives from talking about share prices, but Whitacre's remarks were ill-advised, said Peter Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University in Detroit who worked as an attorney in the SEC's enforcement division.

Market conditions could change and GM could announce a lower starting price, which would be seen by investors as a sign of weak demand, Henning said.

"It's probably not a good idea to speculate when you're in the quiet period," he said. "It's probably not something that would ever draw any kind of enforcement action or even an investigation. I think it was probably just an off-the-cuff remark."

Scott Sweet, managing partner of IPO Boutique, a stock offering research firm, said Whitacre's statement could alienate some investors who wanted to pay a lower price. Some investors, he said, are comparing GM's share price to Ford Motor Co., which has made more money than GM this year and is further along in its turnaround plans. Ford shares closed Wednesday at $13.64.

"Someone should have muzzled him on that statement," Sweet said. "The price range may have been put out as a trial balloon to see who laughs, who cries, or who says 'Great, it's cheap.'"

Once GM gets the OK from the SEC to proceed with the sale, it will go on a two-week worldwide "road show" to offer the stock to big investors such as mutual, hedge and pension funds. The U.S. Treasury Department has said that individual investors will also get a chance to buy GM shares.

GM will set a price range before the road show, and it will reveal the final sale price on the day before the sale.

The automaker will not sell any common stock itself, but will sell preferred shares to raise money to pay down debts and fund pension plans. Preferred shares behave like bonds because they offer a set dividend. GM's preferred shares will be converted to common stock in 2013.

The automaker made $2.2 billion in the first half of the year, and should post its third-straight quarterly profit in early November.

GM repaid the Treasury Department $6.7 billion earlier this year, and the government hopes it can get back the remaining $43 billion in the stock sale.

GM Stock Offering -- No Longer a Big Deal. Now a Compact

Does the government really believe the market value of a Large Cap stock is as easy to manipulate as the shares of a Micro-Cap issue in the hands of a Pump-and-Dump brokerage? Or has it dawned on the Obama team that GM is miles away from producing the metrics that are needed to push the stock to the $134-per-share breakeven price the government is sweating for?

U.S. Is Said to Rein in G.M. Stock Offering

By NICK BUNKLEY and MICHAEL J. de la MERCED

September 23, 2010

DETROIT — The initial public stock offering by General Motors will be smaller than previously suggested, and the federal government will most likely sell a relatively small portion of its 61 percent stake in the company, according to people with knowledge of the preparations.

To fetch the highest possible price for the government, G.M. is planning an overall offering of stock valued at $8 billion to $10 billion, which is lower than previous internal targets, according to the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of restrictions on public comments before an offering.

Earlier, there were suggestions the stock offering could rival the largest in United States history, when the credit card giant Visa raised more than $19 billion in 2008. G.M. and its bankers had been pushing for the largest possible offering because that would mean higher fees for the bankers and a larger pool of investors for G.M.

But the Treasury Department has made it clear to G.M. and its underwriters that the government is more interested in setting the highest price possible for the stock rather than maximizing the size of the offering. While both G.M. and the Treasury still hope to reduce the government’s stake in the company to less than 50 percent and rid the company of its Government Motors nickname, that goal may not be met, one of the people said.

The market for initial public offerings has been weak this year, causing concern by Treasury officials that the G.M. stock sale would struggle if it were too large.

Auto analysts are increasingly projecting that G.M. shares could be priced high enough for the government eventually to get back most or all of its remaining $43 billion investment in the automaker. But everyone agrees that will take years.

The offering, which is expected as early as November, will set a benchmark for the stock’s value.

In order to recover all of the government’s investment, the Treasury would have to sell its 304 million shares at an average price of $133.78 a share, before any splits, according to Neil M. Barofsky, the special inspector general for the Troubled Assets Relief Program of the Treasury.

Mr. Barofsky cited that figure in a letter last month to Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, who asked Mr. Barofsky to audit the stock sale.

In the letter, Mr. Barofsky pledged to review G.M.’s stock offering after its approval by federal regulators to ensure that it produced “the highest return for the American taxpayers.”

The price cited by Mr. Barofsky might not be unrealistic, said David Whiston, an automotive equity analyst with Morningstar in Chicago. Mr. Whiston said on Thursday that a G.M. share could be worth $134, though he believed it would sell for less than that.

He said that G.M., after last year’s government-sponsored bankruptcy, had made changes that would help it thrive as demand for new vehicles recovers from today’s levels, which most industry experts consider to be unsustainably low.

“It really is a new G.M.,” Mr. Whiston said. “The cynics of this deal, I don’t think they really understand the billions of cost savings that G.M. has made.”

G.M.’s stock peaked in April 2000 at $94.63 a share.

Although President Obama has said he wants the government to divest as quickly as practical, the Treasury is expected to sell off its interest over at least two to three years. That would allow it to take advantage of increases in the value of its shares, assuming G.M. operates profitably.

“If G.M. continues to improve and the industry continues to improve, they have a shot at getting it all back,” said Michael Ward, an analyst with Soleil Securities.

There is considerable interest about the G.M. offering among potential investors, and the sale is likely to do well, Mr. Ward told members of the Society of Automotive Analysts on Thursday in Southfield, Mich.

“Wall Street is going to be in love with General Motors,” he said.

The size and the price of the stock offering have not yet been decided, the people with knowledge of the preparations said. But the Treasury intends to reserve a large portion of the stock for retail investors.

As part of that push, G.M. intends to split the stock so that it is priced about $20 to $25 a share, these people said.

The Treasury has also declined to set specific limits on where the stock will be sold and to whom. In a statement last week, the Treasury said it expected the bulk of the stock to be sold in North America.

The government would not expressly restrict sales to foreign buyers, these people said, but they added that acquisitions by foreign investors would be limited.

In a related matter, G.M. filed an amended version of the registration paperwork for its offering with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, but it did not reveal details.

The filing included a letter to the Treasury in which company executives committed to using “commercially reasonable best efforts” to manufacture at least 1.6 million vehicles in the United States this year and an increased number in each of the next four years.

The figures are 90 percent of what G.M. had previously agreed to produce under its loan agreements with the Treasury.

The letter also says that AmeriCredit, a subprime financing company that G.M. is buying, plans to sell its private plane in accordance with restrictions placed on companies that received aid from the Treasury’s bailout program.

The New GM -- Made in China, Owned by China

Whe GM brings its stock to market, will the shares be hot? No. The company has got a lot of work to do before investors have something to get excited about.

Government could seek foreign investors for GM

DETROIT – Investment bankers handling the upcoming General Motors Co. stock sale are expected to court foreign investors as well as those in North America, according to a U.S. Treasury Department statement.

GM and the Treasury Department would not comment Sunday on reports that the automaker is in talks with its current partner in China, SAIC, about buying a stake in the Detroit company. SAIC is owned by the Chinese government.

The Treasury Department, in a statement issued late Friday, said investors in GM would be sought across "multiple geographies," with a focus on North America.

The U.S. Treasury loaned GM about $50 billion to help it through bankruptcy protection last year. GM has repaid $6.7 billion. The rest of the bailout money was converted to a 61 percent government stake in the company.

The government hopes to get the remaining $43 billion back with stock sales that could start in mid-November.

Foreign investment in U.S. automakers and other companies is common. Before the stock sale, GM will put on a two-week "road show" of presentations for investors, and several stops are expected to be in cities outside the U.S.

The Treasury statement also said banks underwriting the GM stock sale will be expected to balance getting the maximum price per share and return for taxpayers with having a stable base of shareholders and keeping up interest in several sales that will occur after the initial public offering.

Individual investors will get "ample opportunity" to buy GM shares, but institutional investors such as mutual funds, hedge funds and pension funds will be sought out, the statement said.

"We expect that a large and diverse group of institutional investors will be offered an opportunity to participate, with no single investor or group of investors receiving a disproportionate share or unusual treatment," the statement said.

The government will make ensure general guidelines are followed in the sale "but will not involve itself in decisions regarding allocation of shares to specific buyers," the statement said.

Last week, new GM CEO Daniel Akerson said it will take a couple years for the government to get its money back, but GM has a goal of returning the cash.

Akerson, a former telecommunications industry executive who took over from Ed Whitacre Sept. 1, said the government bailout saved a lot of jobs at GM and helped to preserve the U.S. manufacturing base.

The bailout has bred resentment with some car buyers and hurt GM's sales, however. The automaker hopes the stock sale will end its government ownership and raise money for investment and to reduce debt.

GM filed paperwork in August starting the process to sell stock to the public.

Akerson indicated that it would take consistent earnings from GM and several stock sales before the money is returned.

President Obama also has said all taxpayer money will be returned, but spokesmen later said he meant the money his administration pumped into GM, not bailouts made by the Bush Administration.

GM made $2.2 billion in the first half of the year, a strong sign to investors that it is much leaner and healthier than it was before bankruptcy, when it was losing billions.

The company will not sell any shares of common stock, leaving that to the government and its three other shareholders. But it plans to sell preferred stock, which pays a dividend and will be converted to common shares in 2013.

Chrysler's top executive, CEO Sergio Marchionne, said last week he expects Chrysler's IPO to take place in the second half of next year. Chrysler got $12.5 billion in bailout money from the government in exchange for $7.1 billion in loans and a 9.9 percent ownership stake.

GM Cruze -- Built to Lose

GM is "testing" another electric vehicle. This time, in South Korea. In other words, a place far from US automotive journalists who will rarely get near this vehicle. The Cruze will serve as a useful PR tool until it's no longer necessary to pretend that electric cars are about to arrive.

The Cruze experiment will continue until its safe for GM to say that electric-car batteries are still years from commercial viability.Then, the Cruze experiment can shift to the back burner where it will stay until our next Einstein has the flash of insight that leads to the development of a battery that packs the energy density and recharge speed to make it a winner.

General Motors to test battery-powered models of its Cruze in South Korea

September 18, 2010

NEW YORK (AP) -- General Motors says it will launch a test fleet of electric cars in South Korea as it continues to develop battery-powered models of its Chevrolet Cruze.

The automaker will begin the project at the end of October. It is working with LG Electronics on the project.

The Cruze EV demo fleet will be GM's first compact sedan electric vehicles to hit the road and will be powered by batteries from LG Chemical and propulsion systems from LG Electronics.

The demo fleet in South Korea will consist of Chevrolet Cruzes and GM Daewoo Lacetti Premieres. GM currently markets the vehicle under the local brand in South Korea. The project is aimed at providing data on customer acceptance and battery range.

GM says there's no plan to sell an electric Cruze in the U.S.

By testing an all-electric Cruze that has no gas engine, it's clear that GM is developing a fully electric compact.

"There's no plan to put an electric Cruze in the U.S. market," spokesman Rob Peterson said. "As battery technology matures and that (charging) infrastructure increases as well, battery-electric vehicles could hold a great deal of potential."

GM executives have said repeatedly that the power system from the rechargeable electric Chevrolet Volt will be used in more models.

The Volt can go about 40 miles on battery power, and after that, a small gas engine kicks in to generate power for the car.

Road Hogs

The Three Families of Detroit continue to threaten the US with economic catastrophe unless Taxpayers cough up at least $34 Billion NOW. And maybe more next year. Do they believe they are making an offer Taxpayers cannot refuse? If so, they had better adjust their thinking. Do they believe that America will collapse without them? If they do, then threatening the country with economic collapse if $34 billion is not forthcoming sounds worse than criminal extortion to me. It sounds like treason.

Why do the Auto Companies believe they deserve special consideration? Are the Big Three unaware of corporate history in this country? The answer must be Yes. It seems Chrysler CEO Nardelli has forgotten that it took over American Motors a couple of decades ago because the company was in collapse. What did Chrysler get? Jeep. Probably Chrysler's best line. Where did all the Ramblers go? Into the corporate history books. To business school case studies. Gone, and mostly forgotten.

The list of failed US car companies is long. But this time it's different. The heads of Detroit's Three Families refuse to do what managements are hired to do -- run profitable operations. Instead, they now want to acquire money from an alternative source -- the government. More accurately, the Taxpayers. What does this show? It shows that the auto companies have become the biggest rent-seekers in history. They refuse to be capitalists when it counts. They want to be socialists. Actually, it's worse. They're looking like communists.

According to the current plan, the government will acquire ownership of the means of production. Obama has said he wants to appoint a Car Czar. Central Planning, here we come!! Do we need a bureaucracy to tell us the number of cars to be built during the next 5-year plan?

Let's try this: Let's end the eternal struggle between Labor and Capital. If the Auto Companies want money, let the Taxpayers buy GM at its current market price of less than $3 billion and GIVE the stock to the UAW. Let the United Auto Workers own GM and let them take full charge of the company and make it work. I'll bet they'll find a way before Christmas.

The Auto Industry seems to have missed the business news during the last few decades. Probably because the main venue for getting that news is disappearing.

The Newspaper Industry is vanishing. Print media jobs have been disappearing for years. Now the Print Media itself is disappearing. Some newspapers are shutting down. Others are cutting back, becoming weeklies instead of dailies.That's just a gambit to slow the the pace of decline.

Is anyone crying over the loss of the Newspaper Industry? How about the Shoe Industry? We once made most of our own shoes here in America. Today we import 99%. Textiles. Similar story. Check your shirt collar. The label probably reads Made in Pakistan. By the way, has the loss of shoe manufacturing led to barefootedness among Americans? Or do we have so many shoe choices at so many price points that it's tough to decide which shoes to buy? How about shoe repair shops? They're everywhere.

So too are automotive repair shops. Transmission shops, Muffler Shops, Brake Shops, Oil Change facilities. Is there any part of a car that is left unserviced? No. Do people buy cars that lack comprehensive warranties? Yes. Millions of them every year. Used cars. They're cheaper than new cars, and the lack of warranty coverage is a big reason.

By the way, what's included in a warranty? Of course, the obvious. But GM loses about $1,500 per car. As we all know, warranties are a big source of profits. When a product is well built, the warranty is often a losing proposition for the buyer. Of course, if you have one of the few defective cars, then the warranty is a blessing. But given the higher quality of Detroit's vehicles, how much of the warranty price is actually absorbed by repair work?

The answer? Not much. The warranty is an overpriced insurance policy that is wildly profitable. But Detroit's labor & benefit costs are so high that even with a huge boost from warranty revenue, the companies cannot earn a profit.

Walmart is selling big flat-panel TVs. Why go to Walmart when you can get a better price on the same TV at Best Buy? Here it is: The Warranty. Walmart sells TVs for a little more than Best Buy. But it beats BB by a mile on the price of the warranty. Thus, the total price at Walmart is better than the total at Best Buy.

Maybe Walmart should get into the car dealership business. And maybe Toyota and Honda should teach Detroit how to make cars AND profits in the US.

The Road to Perdition

Lawmakers skeptical as automakers again seek aid
Thursday December 4, 2008 -- Associated Press

Automakers plead with Congress for expanded $34B rescue package, but hear fresh skepticism

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Humbled U.S. automakers pleaded with Congress Thursday for an expanded $34 billion rescue package, but heard fresh skepticism in a bumpy encore appearance. "We made mistakes, which we're learning from," General Motors chief executive Rick Wagoner told the Senate Banking Committee.

Rick Wagoner says GM is learning from its mistakes. But the pace at which GM is learning is so slow it's time to put GM in Special Ed. When he speaks of learning, Rick Wagoner wants us to believe that he's referring to GM's operational mistakes and how Labor and Management fell into a mutually destructive relationship that has brought the company to the edge of collapse. But it's a lot more likely he's subtly referring to the company's approach to extracting money from taxpayers. He's now angry with himself for flying into D.C. on a company jet a couple of weeks ago, burning thousands of gallons of fuel hopping 500 miles from Detroit to D.C. to tell lawmakers the company hopes to build electric cars using no gas at all -- someday. And, as for profits, well, who knows? Someday, yeah, maybe the company will earn a buck. But it's way too soon to estimate when that will happen.

Meanwhile, Management may have lost touch with a lot of car buyers. But Labor has lost touch with reality. Ron Gettelfinger shows us how.

United Auto Worker union President Ron Gettelfinger warned bluntly that in the absence of action by Congress: "I believe we could lose General Motors by the end of this month." He said the situation was dire and that time was of the essence.

He speaks of GM as though it's a patient who is the victim of some disease curable only by actions taken by everyone except the patient. He speaks as though the cure is in the hands of taxpayers, including people who do not own cars or drive, and that those who possess the cure should, out of some moral sense, give freely to the ailing patient.

It has not occurred to Ron and the United Auto Workers that they are GM. That, individually and collectively, they are healthy. It is Ron and the union workers who possess the cure. They are the cure. They can administer it to themselves. They know what it is, but they do not want to admit they know. The truth is simple and painful. But if they admit they know, then they are also admitting they have ripped off car buyers for years, for decades.

How suicidal is their impulse? Will they stick to their delusional expectation of high wages and deluxe benefits long enough to see it all collapse? Or will Ron and the UAW membership awaken from their dream in time to save the industry and themselves from their own folly?

Several lawmakers in both parties, including Christopher Dodd of CT, have pressed the automakers in recent days to consider a so-called "pre-packaged" bankruptcy in which they would negotiate with creditors in advance and downsize, then file for Chapter 11 protection in hopes of emerging quickly as stronger companies. The Big Three have publicly shunned the notion, but executives have indicated in recent days that it might ultimately be necessary.

Gettelfinger told the committee, "We are prepared to do our part." But he also said workers for the auto companies shouldn't have to make disproportionate sacrifices.

Gettelfinger seems to have lost his mind. Is there any sense to his notion that the employees who are the essence of the auto industry are the people who should feel no pain? Of course they should sacrifice. And they should sacrifice disproportionately. It's their futures at stake. Not the future of the nation. Do they care about their futures? Or not? The only proof of caring they can offer is cutting their pay and benefits to the bone. If they are willing to cut enough, the Detroit car companies will survive. If not, the companies and the employees will pass through a chaotic period that will lead to a far more troubled downsizing. At this point, the outlook for Detroit is grim.

GM Board might go Chapter 11 over Wagoner's Objection

Rick Wagoner thinks consumers will avoid cars made by a company in bankruptcy. That's an interesting and amusing thought. It seems he has ignored the fact that for GM to remain solvent it must sell cars to people who are bankrupt, or close to it.

The biggest impediment to cars sales is credit. Buyers have none. As car dealers have acknowledged, a year or two ago, people with low credit scores were big buyers of Big Three vehicles. Today, people with similar credit scores are denied car loans.

Therefore, the de facto bankruptcy of buyers is kicking in. That means giving money to Detroit changes nothing. Except giving money to Detroit means more unsold cars will pile up somewhere. When the number of unsold vehicles begins to overflow the lots on which they sit, the only possible method of moving them is through massive price cuts. Car prices will drop like the price of GM stock in 2008.

Anyway, which is worse? The downsizing of Detroit through a pre-packaged government-assisted Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing? Or the downsizing of Detroit through the de facto bankruptcy of car buyers?

Build them and they will come? Not exactly. Inventories have already climbed to troubling levels. If Detroit is given taxpayer money to build more cars, unsold inventories will punish the industry even more. If cars are moved off lots due to huge price cuts, then losses will soar higher than ever.

If taxpayer money is used to pay auto-workers to stay at home, well, then, why not declare a national work holiday for everyone. If auto-workers can enjoy full pay while the economy slumps and the auto industry faces a substantial contraction, why not extend the same generosity to everyone?


GM, Its Board Race to Craft a Convincing Viability Plan

General Motors Corp. management on Sunday was racing to finalize a viability plan to take to Congress, with a boardroom hellbent on securing a federal rescue loan.

At the same time, directors -- unlike chief executive Rick Wagoner -- are also insisting that all options stay on the table, including a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, if a bailout doesn't come through.

The auto maker, along with Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC, is working to win $25 billion in loans needed to keep the Detroit Three afloat amid soft demand and a credit freeze. Last month, the companies were turned away by Congress, which told them to come back this week with proof that federal funds wouldn't be wasted on a failing business plan.

Dwindling liquidity is forcing GM to weigh several options for its business, including an offer to some bondholders asking them to exchange debt for equity.

Executives are also once again considering killing or selling brands, and cutting even more North American production capacity. GM's plan could become known as early as Tuesday in public filings.

"Everything is on the table," according to one person familiar with the board's thinking. Following Mr. Wagoner's poor performance in Washington last month, the board began meeting more and taking more seriously its obligation to investigate other options.

Mr. Wagoner has said that a filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection isn't a viable option, insisting the auto maker would collapse because consumers won't buy from a car from a company in bankruptcy and obtaining financing would be nearly impossible.

Although members of the GM board agree with Mr. Wagoner's concerns about revenue while in bankruptcy, directors have said they will consider all options as they become necessary.

At this point, it is unclear if the 14-member board has time to execute a prepackaged bankruptcy before GM runs out of cash. Such a process would include getting unions, suppliers, creditors and other parties to agree to concessions first. Then, the company may be able to get through the process in matter of a few months, experts say.

On Tuesday, the day the plans are due, the entire U.S. auto industry will report November vehicle sales that are expected to represent the lowest sales pace in several decades.

UAW President Ron Gettelfinger = Roadblock

It is sad and depressing that Ron Gettelfinger believes the American public owes something to the UAW workers who make cars for the Big Three. Perhaps UAW members deserve sympathy for the straits in which they have found themselves. But financial support from taxpayers? Not a chance.

How did we get here? Through the combined efforts of Management and Labor. The two combatants in the auto industry have been going at it since 1935. Unfortunately, the UAW and its leadership have never fully grasped the notion of foreign competition. It seems the Union has fooled itself into thinking that its only goal was to extract as much as possible from management. The UAW seems to have ignored or denied the impact of its efforts on the auto market itself.

Why have the Big Three lost market share? Many reasons. But changing consumer tastes head the list. Thus, Detroit's problem boils down to intertia. It can't move fast enough to meet the demands of consumers. Sure, Detroit makes some popular vehicles. It makes enough of them to stay in the lead. But the lead continues to shrink and Detroit's losses are growing.

What has slowed Detroit's capacity for change? Union wages & benefits; Government mileage standards; laws relating to dealerships; insufficient foresight in Top Management.

Ron Gettelfinger has pointed the finger at Management for his entire career as UAW President. Okay. And now he's in a position to do something about it. But, he won't. Why? Because he's a moron.

If Ron Gettelfinger and the UAW believe management has been an impediment to the health of the domestic auto industry and the UAW, then it's up to the union members to do something about it. Now they can. They can buy General Motors -- for a song.

A couple of weeks ago General Motors stock was trading around $3 a share. There are six-hundred million GM shares. Hence, the UAW could have bought the company for $1.8 billion. Easily affordable. Of course no move to buy the company was made. Why? Because a Chapter 11 bankruptcy would wipe out their stock-market investment, as bankruptcy filings always do.

Recent panhandling in Washington by the CEOs of the Big Three injected some hope into auto company stock prices. General Motors stock is now about $5 a share, pushing the buyout price to $3 billion.

Gettelfinger seems ignorant of all aspects of finance and economics. He clearly knows nothing about the value of buying the debt of General Motors.

If the UAW were to buy the debt of General Motors, it would have the power to cancel it. At its current prices, GM debt is as much a bargain as its stock -- for the right buyers. GM's debt totals $45 billion. As a result of the company's vast problems and subsequent reductions of its credit ratings to junk status, the debt is selling for a fraction of its face value.

He who owns the debt controls the company. Thus, the UAW, if it wants to make the smart move, can buy GM stock as well as its debt. If the Union buys the debt with the aim of extinguishing it, the stock will rise. If it takes a more moderate path of exchanging the old debt for new debt or equity, the company will get extra breating room.

Bottom line: The Union can own the company. That means full control of the company the UAW claims has been mismanaged by Rick Wagoner and his predecessors. The Union can then negotiate with itself on all issues that continue to put profits out of reach. Seems simple enough. For a small investment the UAW can eliminate the segment of the company that UAW members blame for the problems. What are they waiting for?


GM board reviews new turnaround plan for bailout
Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:32pm EST


DETROIT (Reuters) - The board of General Motors Corp met on Sunday to review a restructuring plan intended to cut costs and win support for up to $12 billion in emergency funding from the U.S. government, a person familiar with the deliberations said.

The GM board meeting came on the same day that United Auto Workers president Ron Gettelfinger signaled his union was prepared to offer further concessions in order to win support for the bailout provided management shared in the sacrifice.

"They need to establish that executive compensation is something that they're willing to curtail," Gettelfinger said in an interview on CNN. "They can also give the government an equity stake in the business.

House and Senate Democratic leaders, in a letter to GM, Ford and Chrysler executives, said the companies demanded that each submit a "credible restructuring plan" by Tuesday.

That is the same day that major automakers are expected to report bleak November sales results that show an only limited bounce from October when the consumer uncertainty and tight credit combined to send sales to 25-year lows.

NOVEMBER SALES SEEN BLEAK

November sales are expected to show the auto industry running at a U.S. sales rate of about 11 million vehicles on an annual basis, down by almost a third from 2007's tally.

Analysts see a chance for GM to stop burning cash if the industry recovers back above a sales rate of about 13 million vehicles and it succeeds with a stepped-up restructuring backed by federal funding in a deal that would involve steep concessions from creditors, executives and the UAW.

The union is under pressure to surrender protections that allow laid-off factory workers at the Detroit automakers to collect over 90 percent of their pay by shifting to a jobs bank. The union agreed to restrictions on the program

A potentially more important concession would be winning new terms for payments by GM and other automakers into a $48 billion trust fund scheduled to take over funding health care benefits for retired autoworkers from 2010.

The revised plan GM is set to submit to Congress is also expected to show cuts to executive pay. The automaker paid its top executives more than $40 million in 2007, even as its stock dropped 19 percent and it posted a loss of $39 billion.

In addition, the GM plan is expected to indicate that the company will ask some bond holders to accept equity and a limited cash payout to redeem the debt they hold.

That proposed debt swap is seen as crucial because GM has more than $44 billion in debt on its balance sheet, analysts have said.

The automaker burned through $6.9 billion in the past quarter and ended September with $16.2 billion. It needs a minimum of between $11 billion and $14 billion to operate and pay suppliers and has warned it could fall short of cash early next year without government help.

The revised plans from all three Detroit automakers are expected to focus on their investment in fuel-saving technology and alternatives like GM's battery-powered Chevrolet Volt.

Analysts expect the automakers to detail confidential product plans that show they have a game plan for meeting federal requirements for a 40-percent improvement in fleet-wide average fuel economy to 35 miles per gallon by 2020.