Sunday, June 22, 2008

Christie Brinkley and her Porn Lover

What's happening here? Christie Brinkley is divorcing her husband for his adulterous activities. Okay. No problem there. But she's also raging about his interest in surfing Internet porn sites. That changes everything. If visiting porn sites is grounds for divorce, well, marriage in America is doomed.

Old joke about men and masturbation: There are only two kinds of liars in the world: those who say they've never done it, and those who say they've quit.

Update 2008: There are only two kinds of liars in the world: those who say they've never visited a porn site, and those who claim they've stopped looking at women having sex.

Update 2010: There's only two kinds of liars in the world: those who say they've never posted a video of themselves having sex on YouPorn.com, and those who claim they've quit.

Christie Brinkley is a beautiful woman whose looks have excited at least two hundred million male libidos for three decades. Unfortunately, no sex video. Plenty of still photos in bathing suits, but no sex video.

What's behind her belief that public scorn, humiliation and opprobrium are ahead for a man who visits porn sites? She has good reason for anger over his sexual adventures with other women. The public revelations of his infidelities embarrassed her and left her feeling humiliated and wounded. She trusted a man who betrayed her, a man who broke the covenant she believed he honored. That hurts. But how does that connect to porn?

Does Christie believe visiting porn sites is adultery? Does she believe it is evidence of deep flaws in the men who watch? Is she hurt by the thought that she herself is incapable of satisfying every element and aspect of her husband's sexual desire?

It seems she would answer "yes" to every question. Has she always been a loyal, honest and true wife? Based on her image? Yes. She's had three marriages in which to demonstrate her personal integrity. She's had children with three men, giving hope to millions of others who would rise to the occasion if it were offered.

Does it disturb other women that a man married to Christie Brinkley would seek sex from other women AND view pornography? It seems that Christie Brinkley thinks so. Undoubtedly she's accustomed to people telling her she's beautiful. She is beautiful. She's also experienced with men who've grown tired of her beauty and sexual nature. What's she like in the sack? She's probably got some good moves. Maybe a trick or two that no one forgets.

Does it matter? Christie, like all women, lives among men, and men are imperfect. Hence, even if Christie were the perfect woman, she would bestow her perfection upon an imperfect man, and that man would behave as all her men have, imperfectly. Because they are men. Then there is the porn.

Whacking off to YouPorn.com may not match getting laid, but when the woman in your life is unavailable, it will do. Clearly this is big business. Video, toys, equipment, all aimed at enhancing the moment, whether experienced solo or with a partner. The notable aspect of video on YouPorn is the staggering abundance of women with extraordinary bodies, and their willingness to enjoy any form of sexual adventure.

Some people might claim the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assassination is the most watched home-movie in history. That might have been true for a number of years. But today, there is undoubtedly a video of some anonymous but beautiful woman moaning in orgasmic ecstacy as her unknown partner fucks her in the ass that has been viewed more times than the Zapruder film. More accurately, there are probably dozens of porn videos that have been viewed more times than the Zapruder film. Maybe hundreds. Perhaps thousands.

Maybe that's it. Maybe she drew the line at anal sex. In one of literature's funniest segments, Philip Roth, in The Human Stain, offered his view. His narrator overhears two anonymous men discussing Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. One is ranting about Clinton's stupidity for getting nothing more than a blowjob from her. Clinton was a fool, said the nameless speaker. Clinton should have fucked in the ass, he said. That would have shut her up. She'd never go public with that story, he said. That anonymous character is probably right.

Christie Brinkley Wants Public Divorce

Former supermodel Christie Brinkley visited New York Supreme Court this morning in an attempt to make her divorce trial public.

In 2006, Brinkley filed for divorce from architect Peter Cook after a decade of marriage. She accused him of having an affair with his then 18-year-old assistant.

If made public, allegations that Cook surfs Internet porn sites are expected to surface. Sources told Access Hollywood that Brinkley wants the case to be made public because she is still upset at her ex.

According to the source: “She’s still spitting mad at Cook."

5 Comments:

Blogger Torrance Stephens bka All-Mi-T said...

now the two type of liars is on point LOL

9:46 AM  
Blogger no_slappz said...

torrance,

The Internet is changing EVERYTHING.

11:10 AM  
Blogger SNAKE HUNTERS said...

==================================

NO SLAPPZ,

We spotted you first on Mohamed Fadly Site. When you toss a tough
question or two, Mohamed avoids; but he will probably answer. He does not tolerate "Reviles" well.

You are welcome to see more of this
Law Student's Perspective; please visit June One Post, 'A Mullah Reality Check'. Tap Comments!

A very interesting discussion on two separate cultures on a collision course. He's a good spokesman for Islam. reb
=================================
www.lazyonebenn.blogspot.com

5:02 PM  
Blogger SNAKE HUNTERS said...

no slappz,
==================================

I have attempted communication with
Mohamed Off/On for over a year. At
times I feel that I am in a serious
conversation with a law student,

and at other times that he's ready
to strap on a devise to favor his allah, or please his personal imam.

Thanks for visiting; we attempt to
provide an Informative Weblog, and you are most welcome sir. reb
=================================
www.lazyonebenn.blogspot.com

12:28 AM  
Blogger no_slappz said...

snake hunter,

mohamed is nothing more than a muslim zealot, as blinded by the lunacy of the koran as any terrorist.

He also practices the standard dopiness of muslims. There is a structure to their argumentative style. They start by agreeing with something obvious -- like -- Does Israel have the right to exist?

Yes, they will say, Israel has the right to exist. However, they will follow that statement with a series of exceptions which always leads to a final conclusion that is opposite of the original agreement.

Yes, they will say, Israel has a right to exist. But, they will conclude, it has NO right to exist in the middle east.

Another muslim favorite is the question of the rights of women.

Yes, they say, women have all the same rights as men. Then they begin to list the exceptions to the original claim. By the time the end of the list is reached, women are slaves under the "laws" of islam.

Fortunately, muslims are technical incompetents. However, their technical incompetence is a demonstration of their poor intellectual skills. Those poor skills extend to everything -- including logic -- and is further demonstrated by their inability to create prospering economies without the geological accident of oil beneath their feet.

Of course the muslims were not the ones who found the oil or understood its value. That required British geologists.

The Kuwaitis were pearl divers before oil was discovered there. Pearl sales to the west were a chief revenue source for the country. But that business was on the edge of collapse when Mikimoto of Japan developed the cultured pearl business. As the pearl-diving business was dying oil was disovered in Kuwait, and that chnaged everything.

If it weren't for the accident of oil, Kuwait would have nothing.

9:41 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home